![]() It is not immediately clear if the commander in chief is referring to the Steele dossier or, as a later Thursday morning tweet seemed to suggest, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, or FISA. Then there is the president’s suggestion that the FBI used an “intel tool to influence the Election.” So, based on Simpson’s testimony and reporting from major media outlets, it would be more accurate to say the dossier was paid for in part by a law firm connected to the Clinton campaign. Fusion then retained the services of Steele. What is public record, so far, is that the Clinton campaign and the DNC hired the firm through Marc Elias, a lawyer with the firm Perkins Coie, to conduct research on Trump and Russia. That undercuts his claims that the dossier was produced via purely partisan efforts. Trump’s tweet excludes any mention that an unknown “Republican client” funded the firm’s work on his Russia ties even before the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee inquired about retaining its services. The president’s claim that the Democratic Party paid for the Steele dossier is also murky at best. Do you understand that?” Simpson replied: “Yes, I do.” That statute applies to your statements in this interview. Code “makes it a crime to make any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation in the course of a congressional investigation. Grassley, informed Simpson at the start of the session that the U.S. That’s because while he was not under oath, Patrick Davis, the deputy chief investigative counsel for panel Chairman Charles E. If the Fusion co-founder misled the Judiciary Committee staffers during the August interview, he did so knowing it could result in jail time. “One of those pieces of intelligence was a human source from inside the Trump organization.” He added that the FBI had a “walk-in” whistleblower who was someone in Trump’s orbit. “They believed Chris might be credible because they had other intelligence that indicated the same thing,” Simpson said. In fact, Simpson told the Judiciary Committee that when Steele was interviewed by FBI officials in Rome in September 2016, the bureau signaled they had obtained some of the information he had collected prior to him even writing the first memo in his dossier. So it would be accurate to brand the Steele dossier as “questioned.” But the document has not been “disproven.” ![]() Watch: Trump’s 2018 Legislative Agenda is Already Slipping Senate Judiciary member Lindsey Graham and others, for instance, have called on the Justice Department to name a second special counsel to investigate the actions of the Clinton campaign and Fusion GOP during the 2016 campaign. Trump, White House aides and many Republican lawmakers continue to raise doubts about its contents. Its co-founder, Glenn Simpson, described the document as “a collection of field memoranda, of field interviews” in testimony before the senior staff of the Senate Judiciary Committee in August. The firm had been hired by Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign. ![]() Unpacking his many claims and implications has to start at the very first word: “Disproven.”Īt issue is a dossier of information about Trump and alleged ties to Russians that was compiled by former British spy Christopher Steele for research firm Fusion GPS. Did FBI use Intel tool to influence the Election?” Did Dems or Clinton also pay Russians? Where are hidden and smashed DNC servers? Where are Crooked Hillary Emails? What a mess! Thursday, in his own words:ĭisproven and paid for by Democrats “Dossier used to spy on Trump Campaign. President Donald Trump on Thursday labeled a dossier of information about his alleged Russia ties “disproven,” suggesting it was directly paid for by the Democratic Party and used by the FBI to tip the scales in the 2016 election.īut each of those claims is dubious at best.įirst, here is what the president tweeted just after 6:30 a.m. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |